February CET
#261
Posted 22 February 2012 - 18:02
#262
Posted 22 February 2012 - 18:16
Website at http://www.sheffieldweather.co.uk
Mobile link at http://http://www.sh...uk/iphone/#home
Mobile phone Lightning detection http://www.sheffield...her.co.uk/spark
#263
Posted 22 February 2012 - 18:48
http://www.metoffice..._info_mean.html
Yesterday was 7.3C. Minimum today is 8.0C while maxima will probably be a little over 10C, so we'll probably be around 2.9C tomorrow.
After that, with the 12z GFS, the CET will be at
3.3C to the 23rd (12.7)
3.7C to the 24th (12.0)
3.9C to the 25th (8.1)
4.0C to the 26th (7.3)
4.3C to the 27th (12.0)
4.6C to the 28th (12.3)
4.7C to the 29th (8.9)
Could end up very close to the 1981-2010 average after corrections.
Highest Temperature - 20.2C March 29th
Highest Minimum - 13.2C May 22nd
Warmest Day - 14.4C March 1st (Min 12.1, Max 16.6)
Highest Heat Index - 20.2C March 29th
Thunderstorms - 0
Hail Showers - 6 (March 7th, April 13th, 17th, 20th & 23rd)
How I learned to stop worrying and love Anonymous
Message to Occupy Police
Julian Assange now detained for 532 days without charge.
#264
Posted 22 February 2012 - 22:25
Alos looks like being a very dry Feb for many parts of england and wales (so here mind!) - Feb can be a very dry month and the driest of the year in some places something which still surprises some people.
#265
Posted 22 February 2012 - 22:36
damianslaw, on 22 February 2012 - 22:25 , said:
Alos looks like being a very dry Feb for many parts of england and wales (so here mind!) - Feb can be a very dry month and the driest of the year in some places something which still surprises some people.
I'm going to be too low yet again with my CET guess, this time by around 1C. I think Feb 2012 will turn an overall CET value very close to that of 2009 (4.1C), although if anything it will probably be slightly higher. Certainly wasn't expecting this two weeks ago!
#266
Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:01
#267
Posted 23 February 2012 - 16:01
Also another possible record is that Feb 2012 could turn out to record the warmest second half of February since before 1772. The warmest second half of February ever so far was in 1926, which saw a CET of 8.4*C.
#268
Posted 23 February 2012 - 16:10
#269
Posted 23 February 2012 - 16:53
Scorcher, on 23 February 2012 - 16:10 , said:
#270
Posted 23 February 2012 - 17:06
North-Easterly Blast, on 23 February 2012 - 16:53 , said:
Hmm ok I was expecting the minimum to be higher than that, can't see it happening then. That's amazing that the record CET day occurred at the beginning of the month in 2004.
#271
Posted 23 February 2012 - 17:08
Feb 2005 was dominated by northerlies and easterlies persistently after the 12th, and saw some wonderful easterly synoptics from the 20th onwards, later backing northerly, yet the synoptics failed to bring anything particularly cold, and the average for the last nine days was 1.5. With the coldest possible synoptic setup, I would have expected a well sub zero last nine days, but it wasn't. Given the synoptics of Feb 2005, it was a big let down that the month recorded a CET that was still a shade above average, when the synoptics ought to have produced a much colder month.
Feb 2006 again saw an easterly setup at the same stage in the month as 2005, but this was even less potent than the Feb 2005 easterly, and the CET was over 3*C in this nine day spell, and some days in that spell even failed to come in below average. These late Feb 2006 synoptics should have produced colder temperatures than they did; as such it was a let down that the CET for that month was still close to the older 1961-90 and 1951-80 averages, when the synoptics later in the month ought to have been cold enough to bring the month's CET down to less than 3 degrees.
Feb 2009 saw a cold snowy spell in the first half, yet went belly up in mid-month and gave way to a very mild second half with the overall result that the month's CET was in the end close to the average, or even slightly above the older sets of averages.
Now Feb 2012 has gone the same way as Feb 2009, and even could well exceed the pear shapedness of Feb 2009, and will again fail to bring in a colder than average month, by the older 1961-90 and 1951-80 standards at least.
What does it take to get a colder than average February;we managed it in 2010, but how rare was that?
#272
Posted 23 February 2012 - 18:37
#273
Posted 23 February 2012 - 19:25
cheeky_monkey, on 23 February 2012 - 18:37 , said:
#274
Posted 23 February 2012 - 19:47
snow? norfolk n chance, on 22 January 2012 - 18:53 , said:
something like 2.0C first half, 7.1C 2nd half
22nd Jan, not looking far out I dont think, maybe too low though 5.1C, unusual for me to predict winter CET's too low
#275
Posted 23 February 2012 - 20:30
#276
Posted 23 February 2012 - 21:04
A year in the more distant past which was similar to the last nine months or so was in 1898-1899. In 1898 the July was on the cool side, but like in 2011, in July 1898 the mean minimum was low but the mean maximum wasn't especially so. In 1898 the autumn was on the warm side, though less so than in 2011, and the winter of 1898-1899 was very mild with little in the way of cold spells, and little snow, and even milder overall than winter 2011-12 will turn out.
OK, the weather in the last nine months may not match the weather from June 1898 - Feb 1899 exactly month by month, but those nine months of that year bear striking similarities to the same period during these last nine months..
#277
Posted 23 February 2012 - 22:45
Feb in recent years has often been a month of two contrasting halves, 2009 saw a cold first half and very mild second half - like this year, 2008 saw an unsettled first half followed by a very dry sunny second half, 2005 and 2006 saw colder second halves and mild first halves. Feb 2010 was consistently cold - nothing exceptional but it was a decent winter month, but such months have been very rare in the last 25 years, even 1991 ended with a mild last week.
This feb cet value masks a month of two very contrasting halves with hardly any average conditions, just cold/very cold, or mild/very mild. This winter also must go down as one of the most least northerly/easterly ever, with winds predominantly coming from a west to southeast direction, with very shortived northwesterly winds - can't remember the last true northerly - probably last July - when they are no good to anyone.
#278
Posted 23 February 2012 - 23:13
damianslaw, on 23 February 2012 - 22:45 , said:
Feb in recent years has often been a month of two contrasting halves, 2009 saw a cold first half and very mild second half - like this year, 2008 saw an unsettled first half followed by a very dry sunny second half, 2005 and 2006 saw colder second halves and mild first halves. Feb 2010 was consistently cold - nothing exceptional but it was a decent winter month, but such months have been very rare in the last 25 years, even 1991 ended with a mild last week.
This feb cet value masks a month of two very contrasting halves with hardly any average conditions, just cold/very cold, or mild/very mild. This winter also must go down as one of the most least northerly/easterly ever, with winds predominantly coming from a west to southeast direction, with very shortived northwesterly winds - can't remember the last true northerly - probably last July - when they are no good to anyone.
Regarding this winter and how it will turn out, yes it has been significantly milder than the last three, although not as mild as 2006-07 and 2007-08. Although on one hand even despite not being cold, the post Xmas part of winter 2011-12 could turn out to be slightly colder overall than the post Xmas part of winter 2010-11, and the two week cold spell we got this winter from the end of Jan through until almost mid Feb was colder than anything that winter 2010-11 delivered after Christmas. Basically winter 2011-12 has not been much different to 2010-11 apart from being without a cold spell to begin with. Most parts of the country have seen below average snowfall, and a number of areas have seen little snowfall, but if anything the post Xmas part of winter 2010-11 saw very little snow and was virtually snowless for most of Britain.
Edited by North-Easterly Blast, 23 February 2012 - 23:26 .
#279
Posted 24 February 2012 - 05:50
North-Easterly Blast, on 23 February 2012 - 23:13 , said:
Oh I'm sorry but I really can't let that comment slip through unchallenged!
Winter 2010-11 did indeed have a mild second half but it delivered the first sub-zero CET month for a quarter of a century and was the coldest December for over 100 years. At -0.7C for the whole month that was incredibly cold. It was also widespread.
As has been pointed out, the little cold snap in the eastern half of the UK this month hardly touched the far west.
The CET last winter despite the mild February was 3.1C. This year's CET is going to come out somewhere close to 5.1C which is a full 2C warmer than last year, a big amount for meteorological winter. Even January 2011 will be colder than anything winter 2011-12 will have produced if, as expected, the one colder offering this year rises up to near 4C.
And I haven't even mentioned the snowfall, which in 2010-11 was both intensive and extensive. Many parts of the UK this winter have seen nothing at all, and those who did saw something fleeting for a few days.
I couldn't leave that unchallenged because I think it's very wrong. Empirically winter 2010-11 was far colder.
#280
Posted 24 February 2012 - 07:41
West is Best, on 24 February 2012 - 05:50 , said:
Winter 2010-11 did indeed have a mild second half but it delivered the first sub-zero CET month for a quarter of a century and was the coldest December for over 100 years. At -0.7C for the whole month that was incredibly cold. It was also widespread.
As has been pointed out, the little cold snap in the eastern half of the UK this month hardly touched the far west.
The CET last winter despite the mild February was 3.1C. This year's CET is going to come out somewhere close to 5.1C which is a full 2C warmer than last year, a big amount for meteorological winter. Even January 2011 will be colder than anything winter 2011-12 will have produced if, as expected, the one colder offering this year rises up to near 4C.
And I haven't even mentioned the snowfall, which in 2010-11 was both intensive and extensive. Many parts of the UK this winter have seen nothing at all, and those who did saw something fleeting for a few days.
I couldn't leave that unchallenged because I think it's very wrong. Empirically winter 2010-11 was far colder.
Lets look at winter 2010-11 to see how pear shaped it was. Despite January returning a CET close to the 1961-90, 1951-80 and older averages, it was 4.4*C warmer than the previous December, making it the third largest increase from December to January on record. The 7.1*C increase from December to February in the same winter is by some way the largest on record.
If Feb 2012 comes out with say a CET of 4.0, which seems possible; Jan 2012 had a CET of 5.4, then the average for Jan - Feb 2012 will be 4.7, which will be slightly colder than Jan - Feb 2011, which had a CET of 5.0 combined. So there is still a possibility that the post Xmas part of winter 2011-12 will be slightly colder overall than the post Xmas part of winter 2010-11. So on one hand two thirds of winter 2011-12 could turn out to be slightly colder overall than the same two thirds of winter 2010-11, making the only difference being that 2011-12 was without the cold spell pre Xmas compared to 2010-11.
Edited by North-Easterly Blast, 24 February 2012 - 07:47 .
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













