Model Discussion - January 17th
#21
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:29
#22
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:30
Osbourne One-Nil, on 17 January 2012 - 16:25 , said:
The result is that the jet stream is less strong and more amplified.
This measns that the the LP is more likley to go SE and the Azores high dissappear off as seen in the later frames.
Edited by swilliam, 17 January 2012 - 16:30 .
Stewart
#23
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:33
swilliam, on 17 January 2012 - 16:30 , said:
The result is that the jet stream is less strong and more amplified.
This measns that the the LP is more likley to go
SE and the Azores high dissappear off as seen in the later frames.
you tell it apart from other low pressure systems? Thanks.
Edited by sn0wman, 17 January 2012 - 16:34 .
#24
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:35
sn0wman, on 17 January 2012 - 16:33 , said:
you tell it apart from other low pressure systems? Thanks.
I personally look for those very dark blues and purples over the Pole. As far as I can tell that is the Polar vortex
Grimsby, North East Lincolnshire 16m asl
#25
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:35
Edited by Tim Bland, 17 January 2012 - 16:38 .
#26
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:35
12z:

6z:

Azores high backing west, ridging slowly towards Greeny, Russian high ridging westwards towards the Arctic/Svalbard, PV further west, trough digging SE through the UK. If the trough continues to dig SE'wards, and the Azores high continues to back west and north, then it could show an interesting solution in the medium term with many more options for cold and snowy weather.
Edited by danm, 17 January 2012 - 16:35 .
#27
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:36
sn0wman, on 17 January 2012 - 16:33 , said:
you tell it apart from other low pressure systems? Thanks.
The PV is the area with low damn values.
Basically the Purple areas.
Edited by Radiating Dendrite, 17 January 2012 - 16:36 .
#28
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:38
GFS @ t186:
#29
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:41
http://www.meteociel...=120&carte=1021
http://www.meteociel...=144&carte=1021
#30
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:42
sn0wman, on 17 January 2012 - 16:33 , said:
you tell it apart from other low pressure systems? Thanks.
Just to add to my previous reply these two charts from last December show how the PV can get dislodged from Greenland and affect areas much further south, including us. Note the dark blue/purple colours.
http://www.wetterzen...00120101216.gif December 16th 2010
http://www.wetterzen...00120101217.gif December 17th 2010
Edited by Grimsby Snow Lover, 17 January 2012 - 16:42 .
Grimsby, North East Lincolnshire 16m asl
#32
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:42
#34
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:45
Little amplification,strong jet.
Back to square 1,i rather think so.
#35
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:46
Up until that point the signs were encouraging.
As is always the case, the GFS blows up lows in the low-res part and flattens the pattern.
#36
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:48
happy days, on 17 January 2012 - 16:45 , said:
Little amplification,strong jet.
Back to square 1,i rather think so.
Not sure where you are getting that from.
The jet was much better positioned in the hi-res run compared to the 6z with better amplification.
The canadian high is also seen to be continuing its development which is a good sign and the PV was shifted further west yet again.
It went wrong in FI, but the GFS always flattens the pattern in FI.
#37
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:49
#38
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:50
Radiating Dendrite, on 17 January 2012 - 16:48 , said:
The jet was much better positioned in the hi-res run compared to the 6z with better amplification.
The canadian high is also seen to be continuing its development which is a good sign and the PV was shifted further west yet again.
It went wrong in FI, but the GFS always flattens the pattern in FI.
Not sure ukmo looks all that mind blowing either.
#39
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:51
Radiating Dendrite, on 17 January 2012 - 16:46 , said:
Up until that point the signs were encouraging.
As is always the case, the GFS blows up lows in the low-res part and flattens the pattern.
Agreed. i was encouraged that up to +96 there was very little difference between 6z and 12z if not slightly better in the 12z. Quite a variation in FI at times when looking at the jetstream which I find interesting, I see further hints of a NW, SE tilt when excluding the FI mega lows.
#40
Posted 17 January 2012 - 16:52
ukpaul, on 17 January 2012 - 16:49 , said:
BUT IT WENT WRONG IN THE LOW-RES PART OF THE RUN.
I am sorry, but people are still treating the post 180 period as gospel.
What does the GFS nearly always do to lows in the low-res part of the run..............answers on a postcard!
One clue.....bomb.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked









