Model Discussion - 16th January
#41
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:03
Strat looks good. PV on the wain (from background signals), more amplification from the GFS.
Just need a little more correction and we're there !
Y.S
#42
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:03
Overall the best outputs of the winter so far because these are at 144hrs and we're not looking into FI for signs of a snowflake. We await the ECM to see what that has to say.
#43
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:04
#44
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:04
The PIT, on 16 January 2012 - 16:56 , said:
Anyway let's see what the ECM brings.
Edited by Anonymous21, 16 January 2012 - 17:36 .
#45
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:10
Frosty039, on 16 January 2012 - 17:01 , said:
Its your opinion and I respect that. I wasn't being mean (sorry if I came across that way)
Exactly! This is the pattern change forecast by GP! Thats why we havent seen anything like this is the last 6 weeks. just because it hasnt happened yet doesnt mean its not going to, infact statistically its probably more likely that we do see cold
I do see your point, and were not not going to know for sure for a good while yet with all this uncertainty.
But you cant argue that these are the best charts this winter, and they continue to get better each run (more or less)
#46
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:10
http://modeles.meteo...-1-1-150.png?12
OR 5
http://modeles.meteo...-5-1-162.png?12
OR 7
http://modeles.meteo...-7-1-144.png?12
OR 11
http://modeles.meteo...11-1-156.png?12
Or 15
http://modeles.meteo...15-1-180.png?12
Or 18
http://modeles.meteo...18-1-180.png?12
Remember the prediction ENSEMBLE MEAN to -8c for londres on the 23rd
The GFS is edging west every run!
S
Edited by Steve Murr, 16 January 2012 - 17:11 .
#47
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:11
KTtom, on 16 January 2012 - 17:03 , said:
The Gfs 12z looks more wintry than the 00z which had the uk in 8-10c relatively mild air next sat/sun, the 12z doesn't and it looks similar but not as good as the Ukmo 12z so there are some positives, it's improving for a cold weekend.
Edited by Frosty039, 16 January 2012 - 17:15 .
#48
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:13
Zakos, on 16 January 2012 - 17:10 , said:
Yes the Gfs is still playing catch up after a poor start today, i'm happy with the gem, ecm and ukmo at the moment from a colder perspective.
Edited by Frosty039, 16 January 2012 - 17:17 .
#49
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:14
Still need to see the pattern back west 2 hundred miles if we are going to benefit IMO,Central Europe looks good for a cold blast though.
#50
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:15
chionomaniac, on 16 January 2012 - 17:00 , said:
And I think that everything will be a little further west as the negative zonal mean anomalies put a stop on the eastward flow.
Just for FUN, at T+192:
Reminds me of Dads Army. So close for the south.
You are such a tease Chinio.
The floodgates should certainly be opened in the not so distant future and to my mind, one question remains.
From which direction, will the Dad's Army battalions be attacking us?
At this stage, come t+120 and beyond, I would hedge my bets at say, 60% in favour of the north west, 30% in favour of the north east and only 10% likelihood a south western air mass attack.
I am most definitely looking forward to the next few runs from all the various models.
Regards
gottolovethisweather
Edited by gottolovethisweather, 16 January 2012 - 17:22 .
For those that may be interested, I have a weather station that can viewed via the above link or directly via Weather Underground at http://www.wundergro...ation=IWESTBER2
Finally, if I may quote Mr. Data.
"Wasn't it enough that we lived through the coldest December for over 100 years that no one alive has experienced?"
#51
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:16
Steve Murr, on 16 January 2012 - 17:10 , said:
http://modeles.meteo...-1-1-150.png?12
OR 5
http://modeles.meteo...-5-1-162.png?12
OR 7
http://modeles.meteo...-7-1-144.png?12
OR 11
http://modeles.meteo...11-1-156.png?12
Or 15
http://modeles.meteo...15-1-180.png?12
Or 18
http://modeles.meteo...18-1-180.png?12
Remember the prediction ENSEMBLE MEAN to -8c for londres on the 23rd
The GFS is edging west every run!
S
Sure is >
#52
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:19

...but it doesn't quite reach us. But if you compare this chart with the corresponding chart from the GFS 6z (below), we are closer to being affected by that easterly. As Nick Sussex said, the PV is more elongated, and that pesky low sitting over southern Greenland has more energy going north rather than east compared to the 6z. As a result the easterly edges a little closer, and we see more ridging of heights towards Svalbard from the Russian high. If we can see the PV back a little further west, and if the low over S. Greenland continues to see energy diverted north, rather than east (i.e become less flat) then that gives us a greater chance that the easterly will reach our shores on the GFS.
Here is the GFS 6z for the same time to compare:

Plenty of potential out to 144 on the GFS. Whether that potential will translate to an outcome remains to be seen.
Edited by danm, 16 January 2012 - 17:22 .
#54
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:38
http://www.meteociel...44-21.GIF?16-17
http://modeles.meteo...12-0-144.png?12
That Azores high is still reluctant at this stage to move far enough away to allow that trough from Scandinavia to disrupt further west which would bring the cold to us.
It`s a close thing on these runs with the Atlantic just strong enough to hold back anything from the east just now.
It`s worth watching for further vortex disruption over Greenland/Iceland -if things react as the background factors suggest.
We are looking for the jet to buckle some more as it loses energy from the weakening vortex.
As it continues to disrupt and throw more shortwaves south east there`s more opportunity for one of these to undercut the block to our north east.Something like this
http://modeles.meteo...12-5-192.png?12
That is at the end of the HR part of the run but if the GFS is shown to be over progressive then this could happen sooner.
Things are finally balanced so the slightest change in the amount of energy from upstream will have a big influence on the temperatures for our little island.
Edited by phil n.warks., 16 January 2012 - 17:38 .
Veteran of the 1962/63 Winter when Snow lay for 66 days ---will we ever see its like again?.
#55
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:43
Low heights over Greenland and Arctic right now -http://policlimate.c...mslp_natl_1.png
Heights rise significantly by the end of the run despite us missing out on the cold on this run.http://policlimate.c...slp_natl_65.png
#56
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:47
shedhead, on 16 January 2012 - 16:47 , said:
the plus side however it is at least likely to be in situ come this time next week, which is not something we've been able to say hitherto this Winter, so all is far from lost re Feb at this stage.
You have just completely written the rest of Jan off. The way the GFS has and is coming round and the amplification we are seeing 120 then I may suggest that not all is lost for the last 7/8 days of Jan either? UKMO could develop onto deep cold and I think Old met man mentioned earlier, the SW following just south of Greenland would IMO either quickly get absorbed SE ward into first trough or IMO just not develop into anything and just not be there as we get neartime.
BFTP
BFTP
#57
Posted 16 January 2012 - 17:59
BLAST FROM THE PAST, on 16 January 2012 - 17:47 , said:
BFTP
I have not completely written the rest of Jan off, I'm simply suggesting Feb offers the greater potential. My earlier post talked about little change across the hi res part of the run, which ends on the 24th and still leaves a week of Jan to go.
#58
Posted 16 January 2012 - 18:03
Strange how we all see things differently though. Some people only seem to see the end results of a model run, i.e. if that run verified will it snow, how cold will it be etc etc. I see a tipping point that is very very close to being reached and when it does we will be seeing very different charts. Still expecting more amplification to be fed into the models over the next couple of days and a westward trend
It will no doubt, & quite rightly, remain open to conjecture as to what exactly has caused it and obviously it is multi-factoral. The PDO and solar influences are surely a part of it, but whatever has caused it the facts are presenting themselves to us as clear as day... Four years ago we saw the start of a distinct shift in weather patterns when the PF jet started to show a far greater interest in visiting more southern climes. Successions of predominately mild Atlantic driven winters are soooo last cycle!
(1988-2007?)#59
Posted 16 January 2012 - 18:09
This season I shall be mostly clutching snowballs
#60
Posted 16 January 2012 - 18:18
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked












