Model Discussion Thread - 15th Jan
#41
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:03
#42
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:05
Only for the GFS to turn around six hours later and state i was joking all along and move towards the ECM.
To be honest after accepting a flat pattern this morning there are now strong suggestions of blocking appearing and good cold potential, very confused by the models especially as we are told that the 12z GFS is the most progressive when it comes to the jet.
If the ECM sticks with its pattern from the 0z i might actually give up.
#43
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:08
CONTROL at 150
http://modeles.meteo...-0-1-150.png?12
Mean at 144-
http://modeles.meteo...21-1-138.png?12
Some awsome ensembles
I will take number 3 7 or 13
S
SylvainTV, on 15 January 2012 - 17:04 , said:
Done sorry
Thanks Mate- Loving the NH plots on Meteociel at the mo-
Nogaps NH chart
http://modeles.meteo...0-180.png?15-17
Steve
#44
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:09
mountain shadow, on 15 January 2012 - 17:00 , said:
Never said it was great
#45
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:20
#46
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:22
#48
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:32
camiscool, on 15 January 2012 - 17:22 , said:
18:00 meteociel.fr updates the quickest
http://translate.goo...gfse_cartes.php
http://darlington-weather.webs.com/
Weather stats for 2012 can now be found on one easy to read page
#49
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:33
camiscool, on 15 January 2012 - 17:22 , said:
John
My Weather Station (My Website): http://members.upc.ie/john.cox3/
Sacra member No.8.
NADSDLA member No. 1.
#50
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:35
http://forum.netweat...t-update-times/
Air frosts since the autumn - forty six
Lowest temperature: -8.6º
Days with snow falling: nineteen
All views I express are either my own or someone else's, which I've copied because I think they might make me sound intelligent, but definitely not Paul's or Netweather's.
#51
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:36
I also like how far south its beginning to model the Low Pressure systems on this inter pattern zonal period.
I'm expecting an Average December, A Little Below Average January, and a Below Average February in this very changeable Winter.
2011/2012 Winter Snow (in and around Jarrow, Hebburn and Newcastle)
Friday 16th December - Snow Falling and Lying,
Monday 30th January - A Flurry or two,
Tuesday 31st January - A Flurry,
Saturday 4th February - Snow Falling and Lying,
Sunday 5th February - Snow Lying,
Total - 5
#52
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:37
Steve Murr, on 15 January 2012 - 16:20 , said:
http://modeles.meteo...12-5-150.png?12
to THIS
http://modeles.meteo...12-5-126.png?12
in 24 hours.....
S
#53
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:44
Seriosuly, plenty more twists and turns to come and my eyes are drawn to the second shortwave dropping in. How small can we make the warm sector ?
#54
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:45
http://www.wetterzen...cs/Rukm1441.gif
http://www.wetterzen...00119860128.gif
This chart is from the 18th January 1986,
http://www.wetterzen...00119860118.gif
looking at he current models at this time frame, I personally believe we are in a better situation, so the hints we keep getting for the rest of the month into February might not be far off the mark. if, in 1986, they could get that chart and 2 weeks later, one of the coldest February's on record, then we surely have a good chance. The pattern of the winter, is awfully similar to that winter.
#55
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:45
Some really interesting solutions on offer this evening from the models although the GFS continues to drag its heels, but given that it was wrong within 96hrs then hardly a model to read too much into at the moment.
In terms of the UKMO and whether it will topple the ridge into Europe, this is unlikely as the blocking to the east is stopping that trough over Europe so the highs got nowhere to go.
The models by and large follow the ECM ensemble mean of recent days with troughing locked in over Europe.
I think the next uncertainty is going to be where that low pressure goes near Iceland, if the block to the east extends further west this will be forced to head s/se in towards the UK.
What happens after that way too far out to call.
#56
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:49
Steve Murr, on 15 January 2012 - 17:00 , said:
UPDATED GEM
& the NOGAPS
At 168
http://modeles.meteo...0-168.png?15-17
After near identical looking like the UKMO at 144-
http://modeles.meteo...0-144.png?15-17
SYLVIAN FIX THE NOGAPS NH LINK!!!!!
S
#57
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:50
Cheese Rice, on 15 January 2012 - 16:02 , said:
Looking at the 6z T850 ensembles for Oslo
12Z ensembles
There is a clear divergence between the operational and the rest of the suite, this was prevalent yesterday too
Yesterdays 18z ensembles
We have only got two options.
1.) Low pressure fails to reach Oslo and we see a North West/South East Trajectory of the lows, cold air stays over our North East with high pressure centered over Northern Europe but not over Oslo.
2.) The Operational is correct and the rest of the ensembles fall in line.
You can't really have a midway point either, the high acts as a block or it transfers further east at the force of the lows.
Following on from my earlier post the 12Z is making good progress towards the first option. The high to over N.Europe/Russia is much more prevalent and most importantly further east.
What is shown right at the end of FI is a perfectly plausible evolution from the pattern we are in, you can cut everything out after T192 as I just don't see a high pushing north then building over Norway. If anything I would expect the block to our east to push further west causing a more NW/SW trajectory of the lows allowing heights to build.
.
It all really depends on the strength of the PV/hgh, any high would have to be 1035mb plus to have any chance of stopping the full force of the PV.
Edited by Cheese Rice, 15 January 2012 - 17:53 .
#58
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:50
Steve Murr, on 15 January 2012 - 17:08 , said:
CONTROL at 150
http://modeles.meteo...-0-1-150.png?12
Mean at 144-
http://modeles.meteo...21-1-138.png?12
Some awsome ensembles
I will take number 3 7 or 13
S
Thanks Mate- Loving the NH plots on Meteociel at the mo-
Nogaps NH chart
http://modeles.meteo...0-180.png?15-17
Steve
#59
Posted 15 January 2012 - 17:53
At least we are getting agreement on a brief toppler type set-up now though.
Control run would be a decent solution if we want to keep things below average.
Visit my hurricane blog:
http://www.netweathe...a...g&blogid=41

#60
Posted 15 January 2012 - 18:01
Much better runs and finally the GFS has woken up and realised it was wrong. Im also posting the NOGAPS at +180 because its a scenario I suggested yesterday that could well occur.
http://modeles.meteo...0-180.png?15-17
This morning I said there was a divergence of 9C between the ensembles but this has now changed with a solid clustering around -5C.
http://cdn.nwstatic....bridgeshire.png


0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked









