December CET
#281
Posted 28 December 2009 - 19:18
A run of 17 days so far.
27th January -15th February 2009: 20 day run
8th December 2001 - 12th January 2002: 36 day run
#282
Posted 28 December 2009 - 23:47
Mr_Data, on 28 December 2009 - 19:18 , said:
A run of 17 days so far.
27th January -15th February 2009: 20 day run
8th December 2001 - 12th January 2002: 36 day run
Those figures for 2001/2002 are quite noteworthy showing how although never particularly cold that period was generally consistently below average for a long time, an often forgotton half decent sustained cold period. I know the opening days of 2002 brought a number of ice days to the north of the country, the coldest start to a new year since 1997, beating last year. Shame the rest of 2001/2002 was a mild fest much like what eventually happened in winter 96/97.
#283
Posted 28 December 2009 - 23:52
Visit my hurricane blog:
http://www.netweathe...a...g&blogid=41

#284
Posted 29 December 2009 - 09:44
NADSDLA Member No 3
"...that burning ball of gas in the sky - it's the only thing that prevents the planet from being a lifeless ball of ice engulfed in total darkness."
Jonah Goldberg, LA Times, 21st September 2009.
#286
Posted 29 December 2009 - 09:52
noggin, on 29 December 2009 - 09:44 , said:
It looks like we'll finish at 10.1C. So, another warm year but still one of the cooler ones of the noughties!
Edited by Don, 29 December 2009 - 09:56 .
#287
Posted 29 December 2009 - 10:03
The lack of really mild Decembers over the last two decades is notable considering how many notably mild Januarys and Februarys there have been in the same period.
Only 2 Decembers over 6C for the CET (There were 6 in the 1970s and 1980s)
1994 and 2006
Whilst there have been 4 Januarys and 5 Februarys
As a consequence, December has turned out the coldest month of the last 20 years (1990-2009) than either January or February
Edited by Mr_Data, 29 December 2009 - 11:16 .
#288
Posted 29 December 2009 - 10:52
#289
Posted 29 December 2009 - 11:22
Gavin P, on 29 December 2009 - 10:52 , said:
First half of December 2008 had cold synoptics, back end of December 2001 had cold synoptics as well.
#290
Posted 29 December 2009 - 11:58
Hadley at 3.5 (3.47 rounded up)
Last night down as -1.9 on Hadley so we should be at 3.4 tomorrow
sub 3 and Hadley will require a downward correction, probably in the order of the Dec and Jan 08/09 -0.3 corrections - which means we have about 3 and a half cumulative degrees to play with for the last 3 days of the month (would get us in at 3.24 or thereabouts) - if minima are low we will get this but tonight for example looks above zero.....
Manley should finish 2.9 or 3.0 (maybe 2.8 but that is the lowest it would go I think)
#291
Posted 29 December 2009 - 12:01
#292
Posted 29 December 2009 - 12:04
Gavin P, on 29 December 2009 - 12:01 , said:
We were 2.3 degrees above 2008 at end November - hence 3.5 (same as 2008) would give us 10.15
3.0 would be 10.10 or 10.11 depending on roundings
sub 10 requires 1.6 for December or thereabouts (so no chance unfiortuantely)
10.12 seems about the mark
#293
Posted 29 December 2009 - 12:05
11th-28th December CET: 1.8C
And if the the New Year spell has some really sharp frosts well, I wonder how low that 30 day period will be.
#294
Posted 29 December 2009 - 12:07
#295
Posted 29 December 2009 - 13:26
Mr_Data, on 29 December 2009 - 12:05 , said:
11th-28th December CET: 1.8C
And if the the New Year spell has some really sharp frosts well, I wonder how low that 30 day period will be.
I'd say a sub 3C 30 day period is certain to be honest Mr.Data given what would required to get to 3C now is out of reach given the model outputs....
Given most of the models are cold out to the 8-9th at least, it will be interesting to see just how low that 30 day period can go, could go sub 1C...
Visit my hurricane blog:
http://www.netweathe...a...g&blogid=41

#296
Posted 29 December 2009 - 16:02
#297
Posted 30 December 2009 - 11:37
Hadley now 3.38 rounded up to 3.4
Last night's minima 1.6, so today may not see enough of a downward movement to get to 3.3
I fancy the finishing number unadjusted for December will be 3.3 and therefore we may see an adjustment to 3.0 or 3.1 (given Manley's current position)
Sub 3 is now the outsider unless a dramatic revision is on the cards.
Manley looks likely to finish 3.0
#298
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:02
snowmaiden, on 30 December 2009 - 11:37 , said:
Hadley now 3.38 rounded up to 3.4
Last night's minima 1.6, so today may not see enough of a downward movement to get to 3.3
I fancy the finishing number unadjusted for December will be 3.3 and therefore we may see an adjustment to 3.0 or 3.1 (given Manley's current position)
Sub 3 is now the outsider unless a dramatic revision is on the cards.
Manley looks likely to finish 3.0
Yes, it is looking unlikely to go below 3.0 which is unfortunate. If only we could have a clear night tonight rather than the blanket of cloud!
A sub 3.0 month would have shut many (global warming) mouths! Nevertheless, it is a very good result for an el nino December!
Karyo
#299
Posted 30 December 2009 - 14:45
karyo, on 30 December 2009 - 12:02 , said:
A sub 3.0 month would have shut many (global warming) mouths!
Karyo
I disagree. Just because we have had a rather cold month, it doesn't even go close to disproving GW. In fact, the latest data out suggests that this decade has been by far the warmest on record, with an overall temperature increase of almost 1C! Let's face it - the weather is significantly milder than in even 20 or 30 years ago. A small short-term anomaly, such as that experienced this month, only proves that cold spells are still possible in Britain (and likely), even in this warming climate. Moreover, the climate is still cyclical; hence, our climate is still subject to cyclical changes (i.e. colder years/wamer years) in the same way that it was decades ago. It's just that we are unlikely to ever get winters like those in 60s/70s ever again.
That said, I think the current CET is looking decidedly cold. Perhaps it's a sign of things to come!
Edited by Matt12, 30 December 2009 - 14:45 .
#300
Posted 30 December 2009 - 14:57
karyo, on 30 December 2009 - 12:02 , said:
A month of anomaly a theory does not prove.
It will be interesting to see how the planets heat transport mechanisms (Hadley cells) cope with this as we head into spring. The heat is normally transported to the poles, but since it doesn't seem to be getting their this year, then is that heat retained waiting for a chance to move?
If so, record breaking hot spring, anyone?
BOT, still, a 3C, or thereabouts December really does go to show the vagueries and variability of the climate. It was only ten years ago that we were told these sort of synoptics given rise to snow were 'rare and unusual'
We've had them two years on the trot, now.
Edited by VillagePlank, 30 December 2009 - 14:59 .













