Locating UK Temperature Stations
#61
Posted 02 August 2009 - 10:31
Since it is related to measurement of temperature, and temperature is a measure of climate change, I figured it was best put here than any where else currently available.
I would encourage contributors to make specific comments on the stations located, and how they may contribute to the study of climate change, and to help locate new ones to provide further examples.
Any other discussion is off-topic. I'll look for some more stations later if everything settles down.
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#62
Posted 02 August 2009 - 19:16
Latitude 51.16667
Longitude -1.75

The nearby airfield doesn't seem to have one and this was close to the coordinates. And this has one of those tower things, the shadow of which, and the radars, you can see in the Google version.

If it is the weather station there, a big if that could only be confirmed by a visit or a "birds-eye view" update to the bingmaps database, or someone that knows who could confirm, not only is there a tower but it's right next to a car park. Lovely.
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#63
Posted 02 August 2009 - 19:59
Latitude 51.38333
Longitude -.78333
This station is located in Beaufort Park
As below, this one was tricky to find. We have a choice of built up area, car park, or woodland.

I got a clue from the Bracknell website's webcam below.

So, I think this is it facing North in the trees here, North East of where the "C" flag is in the overhead shot. The car park is 17 meters away from whatever this is.
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#64
Posted 02 August 2009 - 20:16
53.0311
-0.5035

Anyone want to guess what that enclosure right next to it is for?
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#65
Posted 02 August 2009 - 20:29
Latitude 54.13333
Longitude -1.41667

30 meters / 100 feet from green roofed building.
While not ideal, it's one of the most reasonably sited ones I've found as yet. Disforth is, however, well outside the CET area.
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#66
Posted 02 August 2009 - 22:50
AtlanticFlamethrower, on 02 August 2009 - 20:16 , said:
53.0311
-0.5035

Anyone want to guess what that enclosure right next to it is for?
Is it a dunny for sheilas when they have a barby?
#67
Posted 03 August 2009 - 01:03
Charlwood
51.15 (actual location further south)
-0.233


On this page we actually have a picture of the Stevenson screen which contains the thermometer.

Yes, it abuts the hedge. Another photo shows a plant growing up the side of the metal cage. Not too cold any more!
If this is Redhill (the one at the tiny airport) its location isn't half bad except for the car park 30 meters away.
51.22
-0.13


Doesn't seem to be anything special about it other than it's exposed - someone tell me it's not Redhill.
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#68
Posted 03 August 2009 - 06:53
AtlanticFlamethrower, on 02 August 2009 - 20:29 , said:
While not ideal, it's one of the most reasonably sited ones I've found as yet. Disforth is, however, well outside the CET area.
Not sure what you mean by that? There are only 3 CET stations: Pershore (Throckmorton Airfield), Rothamsted and Stoneyhurst.
Pershore recently replace Malvern - even though it's a known 'frost hollow' and consistently records lower minima.
Evesham, Worcs
Ukww Executive manager
Weather and Earth Science News
The blog without an agenda!
#69
Posted 03 August 2009 - 07:55
Essan, on 03 August 2009 - 06:53 , said:
I had always assumed that the CET was arrived at by using all of the MetO stations within the CET area. Are you saying that the CET is based on the recordings from just 3 out of lots of stations? I ask because, to me, that would seem inefficient and also the link of mine on page 2 shows that there are lots of stations (MetO site).
Genuine question, BTW,as are all of my questions.
Here is the link again http://www.metoffice...images/map6.gif
Edited by noggin, 03 August 2009 - 07:58 .
NADSDLA Member No 3
"...that burning ball of gas in the sky - it's the only thing that prevents the planet from being a lifeless ball of ice engulfed in total darkness."
Jonah Goldberg, LA Times, 21st September 2009.
#70
Posted 03 August 2009 - 09:13
Essan, on 03 August 2009 - 06:53 , said:
It's amazing there are all these notorious "frost hollows" but no HIs.
Here's Pershore BTW which has a number of radiative influences including close by tarmac and the metal cage of the station itself.
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#71
Posted 03 August 2009 - 09:17
Bumbulus Londonicus says: rhubarb, rhubarb, rhubarb...
Non cogito ergo non sum!
Views and opinions expressed in this or any other of my posts are my own
http://www.don-linds.../arguments.html
CCCP
#72
Posted 03 August 2009 - 09:43
the original Manley work
what stations he used and which subsequent ones were chosen and why, along with other links about the topic of CET and temperature readings.
http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/data/cet/
here is my weather station, for local written forecasts or simply browsing further afield.
http://www.johnholmes-weather.co.uk/
see my blog for weather updates as I get time and also my plea for preventing getting skin cancer.
#73
Posted 03 August 2009 - 09:53
AL5 2JQ
This is the second Hadley CET station located, after Pershore.
Apart from the metal tower 8 meters from the Stevenson Screen (the white dot) it's a great site.

This photo was taken in the evening. We know that because the shadows are going North-East.So for part of the morning the Stevenson Screen will be in the shade cast by the tower - but this should rarely affect the maxima. The tower itself radiates heat though - if someone parked a lorry 27 feet away it would soon be moved, but a weather tower doesn't seem to raise the same eyebrows.
Wider view
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#74
Posted 03 August 2009 - 10:43
Take a look at this from Rothamsted. (Tmins).

There is a spike and apparent step change up in min temperature in 1993? compared to those other stations.

Metal absorbs heat during the day and releases it at night. You have to wonder when the tower was put there. Does Rothamsted have its very own radiator?
Edited by AtlanticFlamethrower, 03 August 2009 - 10:47 .
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#75
Posted 03 August 2009 - 11:03
But, the chimney-stack hypothesis is interesting: does it mean that all pre-1993 data were anamolously low, due to airborne smuts?
Bumbulus Londonicus says: rhubarb, rhubarb, rhubarb...
Non cogito ergo non sum!
Views and opinions expressed in this or any other of my posts are my own
http://www.don-linds.../arguments.html
CCCP
#76
Posted 03 August 2009 - 11:23
Pete Tattum, on 03 August 2009 - 11:03 , said:
You mean it easily loses what heat it has to the surrounding environment?
Quote
What is the chimney-stack hypothesis? I've been staring at maps for too long and is a little oblique for me...
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#77
Posted 03 August 2009 - 12:47
Uncertainties in Central England Temperature 1878-2003 and some improvements to the maximum and minimum series
(Parker & Horton, 2005)
Evesham, Worcs
Ukww Executive manager
Weather and Earth Science News
The blog without an agenda!
#78
Posted 03 August 2009 - 12:55
Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#79
Posted 03 August 2009 - 13:25
Quote
Here are two close-ups of the tower that has wandered 8 meters towards the Rothamsted Stevenson screen.

Netweather CET Competition: 2007-8: 1st. 2008-09: ?th. 2009-10: 4th. 2010-11: 8th.
#80
Posted 03 August 2009 - 13:34
AtlanticFlamethrower, on 03 August 2009 - 11:23 , said:
Yes, I do mean that. But it cannot radiate heat once it is colder than its surroundings - simple thermodynamics?
Quote
Well, you posted the link AFT. Maybe, you should have read it first?
Bumbulus Londonicus says: rhubarb, rhubarb, rhubarb...
Non cogito ergo non sum!
Views and opinions expressed in this or any other of my posts are my own
http://www.don-linds.../arguments.html
CCCP
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















